California Proposition 65 (also known as Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act) was enacted as a ballot initiative in November 1986. Prop 65 businesses are required to provide a "clear and reasonable" warning before knowingly and intentionally exposing anyone to a listed chemical “Known to the State” to cause cancer or reproductive harm.

To comply with California's Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act (Proposition 65), companies must conduct a scientific exposure risk assessment for substances listed in the Proposition 65 List that may be present in their products. This provides a clear, step-by-step framework to help companies determine if their products require a "clear and reasonable" warning label. The core of the assessment involves quantifying human exposure doses and comparing them with official safety thresholds. A complete exposure assessment typically follows the steps below, combining model estimation and experimental testing.

On January 12, 2026, the New Jersey State Senate passed Bill S1221, officially titled the Protecting Against Forever Chemicals Act.

Recently, the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) has approved “Words or Symbols” informing the purchaser of PFAS in a product.

This article compiles and summarizes the latest developments in cosmetics regulations in China and globally as of November 2025, covering industry news, newly issued regulations, latest standards updates, relevant policy adjustments, and regulatory requirements. It aims to assist enterprises in ensuring compliance and keeping up with global cosmetics regulatory trends.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are increasingly becoming a focal point of global concern due to their potential long-term impacts on the environment and human health. As a class of synthetic chemicals characterized by high stability and widespread applications, PFAS are facing increasingly stringent regulatory scrutiny in the cosmetics sector. This article explores the physicochemical properties and potential health risks of PFAS, and systematically reviews the evolving global regulatory landscape related to their use in cosmetics. It aims to help cosmetic enterprises gain a comprehensive understanding of regulatory requirements, mitigate compliance risks, enhance product safety, and strengthen competitiveness in international markets.

This article compiles and summarizes the latest developments in cosmetics regulations in China and globally as of October 2025, covering industry news, newly issued regulations, relevant policy adjustments, and regulatory requirements. It aims to assist enterprises in ensuring compliance and keeping up with global cosmetics regulatory trends.

This article compiles and summarizes the latest developments in cosmetics regulations in China and globally as of September 2025, covering industry news, newly issued regulations, relevant policy adjustments, and regulatory requirements. It aims to assist enterprises in ensuring compliance and keeping up with global cosmetics regulatory trends.

USP 61/62, officially known as USP 34: 2011, General Chapter 61 & 62, is set by the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) and establishes essential standards for microbial limits testing in non-sterile products. These chapters are critical for ensuring the safety and quality of a wide range of consumer products. USP 61: Microbiological Examination of Nonsterile Products: Microbial Enumeration Tests. This includes methods for quantifying the presence of total aerobic bacteria, molds, and yeasts. USP 62: Microbiological Examination of Nonsterile Products: Tests for Specified Microorganisms. This involves targeted tests for specific harmful pathogens.

This article compiles and summarizes the latest developments in cosmetics regulations in China and globally as of May 2025, covering industry news, newly issued regulations, relevant policy adjustments, and regulatory requirements. It aims to assist enterprises in ensuring compliance and keeping up with global cosmetics regulatory trends.